Weighing the Week Ahead: From One Crisis to Another

In a dramatic week for stocks concern abated over the Greek situation.  The over-hyped and misleading “end” of QE II came and went.  The economic news was surprisingly positive.  Stocks rose 5.4%, the best week in two years.

Mark Thoma has an excellent summary of the QE II issue, concluding as follows:

The asset purchases made under QE2 expanded the Fed’s balance sheet considerably. However, once the program ends the Fed plans to hold the balance sheet at its present size (e.g. by reinvesting the proceeds of any securities that mature while in their possession).

The effects of QE2 described above depend mostly upon the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, and since the balance sheet is not expected to change until the economy shows signs of improvement, the end of QE2 will not bring about any big changes.

No one really expects the passage of the Greek austerity program to be a permanent solution.  In this article I tried to explain how it can be constructive for governments to make progress, even if temporary.  The progress helps to avoid a Lehman-style systemic impact.  I wonder when someone will get around to investigating how the progress might have been changed had the Strauss-Kahn incident not occurred.

Last week’s action illustrates why markets thrive when there is a highly-publicized, well-identified list of worries.

It must be time for something new to worry about!

For most, the debt crisis will take this role.

I’ll comment on the current worries and the upcoming week, but first let us do our regular review of last week’s high points.

Background on “Weighing the Week Ahead”

There are many good services that do a complete list of every event.  That is not my mission.  Instead, I try to single out what will be most important in the coming week.  If I am correct, my theme for the week is what we will be watching on TV and reading in the mainstream media.  It is a focus on what I think is important for my trading and client portfolios.

Readers often disagree with my conclusions.  That is fine!  Join in and comment.  In most of my articles I build a careful case for each point.  My purpose here is different.  This weekly piece emphasizes my opinions about what is really important and how to put the news in context.  I have had great success with my approach, but some will disagree.  That is what makes a market!

Last Week’s Data

The economic news was surprisingly encouraging.

The Good

There was good news in important indicators.

  • The ISM manufacturing index surprised the market with a nice bounce to 55.3.  If annualized, this corresponds to a 4.5% increase in real GDP.  The Chicago Index showed similar strength.
  • A default of Greek debt was avoided — at least for now.
  • US home prices were up for the first time in eight months, according to the Case-Shiller measure.  Global Economic Intersection has a nice analysis of this and other measures.  The Bonddad Blog also has an interesting new source to consider.

The Bad

The pattern of weak economic data continues to show in some indicators.

  •  Initial jobless claims of 428,000 — still too high to expect solid job growth.  If this is a temporary story from the auto parts supply shortage, we should soon be seeing some improvement.
  • Gasoline prices fell further, but oil prices rebounded.  This is a continuing economic challenge.
  • Auto sales were weak, but there is still some feeling that May and June will represent the low point for the year.  Check out Calculated Risk for the full analysis.
  • Lesser indicators are also very weak.  Personal spending, rail shipments, trucking — you name it — the soft patch is continuing on several fronts.

The Ugly

Watching the making of the debt ceiling sausage gets the ugly award, especially for those unfamililar with the process.  To all appearances the process seems out of control, careening toward a disastrous default on US debt.  Many observers have been increasing their odds of default.

My perspective? Everything is playing out as expected.  Each participant is attempting to maximize rewards for his own constituency.  Each is also maximizing the perceived rewards, proving that any ground was given in a grudging fashion.  While it would be good for the nation as a whole to achieve an early solution, there is no benefit for any individual party to the process.

The result will be a compromise on the eve of July 22nd, currently regarded as the last day possible.  There will be concessions to various parties until a minimal winning coalition is achieved.

Explaining the entire rational is beyond the scope of this weekly survey article, so I’ll try to go into more detail in a separate piece.  Briefly put, there is too much at stake, especially for constituencies important to Republicans.  If there is a default, neither party will escape blame.  The deal will get done.

The Indicator Snapshot

It is important to keep the weekly news in perspective.  My weekly indicator snapshot includes important summary indicators:

There will soon be at least one new indicator, and the current choices are under review.


The indicators show continuing modest growth at a slowing pace, with little indication of economic risk.  The market fears, as is often the case, are greater than one might expect from the data.

Felix is the basis for our “official” vote in the weekly Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment Poll, now recorded on Thursday after the market close. We have a long public record for these positions.

[For more on the penalty box see this article.  For more on the system ratings, you can write to etf at newarc dot com for our free report package or to be added to the (free) weekly ETF email list.  You can also write personally to me with questions or comments, and I’ll do my best to answer.]

The Week Ahead

The important economic news for the week will be all about jobs.  The most significant will be Friday’s employment situation report.  Thursday brings some preliminary employment news from the ADP estimate and the initial claims report (not a part of the payroll report survey period, but still interesting).

The ISM Service index will be studied for confirmation of the message from the manufacturing report.

I expect the political news to grab attention, with a continuing crossfire of zingers.

Investment Implications

In trading accounts last week we closed our inverse ETF positions, so we are completely neutral.  To my continuing surprise, we do not yet have any signals for new holdings.  There are a number of ETFs with good ratings, but everything is still in the penalty box.  Felix is cautious at turning points.

For investment accounts we were more aggressive last week in establishing new positions, and shifting holdings to those with more economic exposure.  As I have noted in recent weeks, the investment time frame requires looking for opportunity when traders are scrambling.

Investors should focus on tangible and objective measures of risk.  These are all in normal ranges, historically profitable for investments, despite the debt ceiling controversy.

You may also like


  • Jeff July 3, 2011  

    As you say: “Stocks rose 5.4%, the best week in two years.”
    Yet in ‘Weighing the Week Ahead” last week you said: “we are net short 40%.” HUGE MISTAKE!
    I keep trying to tell you that a next-week forecast is useless! You are very objective in most of your writing (which is why I continue to read you), but in this one area you seem tone deaf. Repeat, your one-week forecast is useless! Please go to a one-month horizon as your minimum time frame.

  • oldprof July 3, 2011  

    Jeff — You are way off base with this comment, as I explained patiently when you said essentially the same thing about a month ago. Perhaps you did not read the reply, so here is the link: https://www.dashofinsight.com/a_dash_of_insight/2011/05/weighing-the-week-ahead-economic-transition-from-stimulus.html#comment-6a00d83451ddb269e2014e88ce9051970d
    In that comment you rushed to judgment about Felix’s bearish call since the market went up the next day. I pointed out that it is a 30-day forecast, and that is the only fair way to evaluate it.
    I report the change in the 30-day forecast each week, but we run the model twice a day and act accordingly. We sold one of the inverse positions on Monday and the other on Thursday. Our trading accounts did very nicely during the month since your last comment.
    Meanwhile, wearing my investor hat, we found some good opportunities for those accounts as well. The time frames are different, and our approach is different.
    I try to make this as clear as possible, but if you are going to benefit from it, I urge you to read the explanation more carefully.
    You want me to do a one-month forecast, and it IS a one-month forecast. Amazing….