ETF Update: Can Banks Benefit from Financial Regulation?
(I delayed this article from my regular Sunday posting time since there was so much volatility, perhaps generating misleading signals. The ratings have been updated to reflect the current situation and do not include the customary one-day lag).
It now seems clear that new financial regulations will soon become law. Can banks benefit from this development?
Traders all seek rewards but they
have differing appetites for risk. It is important to find a method
that suits your personality and needs. Our trading systems are
basically Trend-following, but also include recognition of Cycles and a
touch of Anticipation. Since we apply the method to ETFs, we call it
the TCA-ETF system. We follow two versions of this method, designed for
two clients with different needs and risk appetite. [New readers can
find more information about the models at the end of this article.]
me discuss this week's featured sector before turning to our own
Spotlight on the Banks
trade banks via the SPDR KBW Bank ETF (KBE). The ETF tracks the KBW Bank Index. It has very good diversification — 25 holdings with most in the 4% to 6% range. A few large banks are higher, but no single holding is over 9% The forward P/E ratio is over 17 and the trailing is over 20, but the price to book is only 1.01. The dividend yield is under one percent. Here is the chart:
Some of the news for the sector relates to the financial reform bill. ETF Daily News opined that changes in the bill were favorable to banks.
There is a consensus that the regulations are more significant for large banks. Even those institutions may have pricing that reflects the pending legislation. GOP changes have relaxed some concerns raised by the banks, especially those related to cost-cutting as a function of size.
In my weekly market column I expressed caution about banks because of possible European exposure. Any improvement in Europe is a positive for financial stocks, so the weekend news was bullish.
Other ETF Experts
We always monitor the
conclusions of other ETF experts when considering a trading position.
This week none of our sources cited the group on technical grounds. (It is important to note the absence of support for a position). It is fair to say that this group is "unloved."
Weekly TCA-ETF Rankings
We are currently fully invested in our ETF
programs, but there are only a few remaining candidates in the "buy" range. We are happy to
report and discuss performance with
interested investors. We also offer a report on how we use the models,
and a free weekly email update.
(Write to etf at newarc dot com). Our actual trading is a
combination of both models and some weekly timing.
We usually publish the ratings list as of
Thursday's close in our weekend update, a one-day delay. Given the wild market gyrations from the last few days, I felt that the Thursday ratings would be unhelpful and perhaps even misleading. Instead, I delayed the article for a day. I am also including today's current ratings.
Please note that we are not
recommending these sectors, since investor needs and risk tolerance
varies. We hope everyone finds the ratings to be a useful supplement to
their own work. The recommendations can change quite rapidly in this environment. I would not be surprised to see every sector in the penalty box in a few days.
Here are the current rankings for
both Oscar and Felix. It is interesting to note that Oscar is even more negative than Felix. While we are mostly following Felix, fans of Oscar should note that the inverse ETFs have positive ratings.
Note for New Readers
Our weekly ETF Update is designed to assist both investors and
traders interested in ETF's and Sector Rotation. We also have free
upon request to etf at newarc dot com. These reports describe how we
use the system, compare results from Oscar and Felix, and contrast the
method with our long-term trading approach.
In this past article, we described our basic methodology
and why we believe the rankings are useful for fundamental traders and
technical traders alike. While we urge readers to check out the entire
article, the key point is that ETF's pose challenges and opportunities
different from investment in individual stocks. The fundamentals may be
more difficult to assess. Even with a good grasp on fundamental
trends, there is a lot of technically-based trading in ETF's. This
means that those trading with a fundamental approach (and we
do this as well) want to monitor the "hot money" moves. Here is an article on that point.
synopsis. We look at Trending sectors, Cyclical Sectors, and build
in an element of Anticipation for both entry and exit — thus the name
of the model, TCA-ETF. While we do not reveal the exact methodology for
spotting trends and cycles, the system is not a "black box." The basic
elements are used by many, and widely reported. We even discuss the need for human analysis as opposed to black box
We report the rankings each week, now on the
weekend with a one-day delay, using the Thursday output from the model.
We monitor and trade this daily, and offer a free report (request via
the email address on the top left of the site) for those interested in
our weekly trading program.
Oscar and Felix. We follow two
versions of this method, designed for
two clients with different needs.
- Oscar believes in the long-term strength of the economy and the
stock market. He has a lovable and irrepressible enthusiasm. When
things go wrong, he steps back for a bit, but soon tries again. He
expects to do better than others during good times. Oscar understands
that this approach involves more risk. Oscar is opportunistic.
- Felix also has a positive long-term outlook, but he is something of a
fussbudget. He is much more cautious, with an emphasis on capital
preservation. He is perfectly willing to step aside from the market
when there are signs of danger. He knows that he will miss some moves,
but that is OK. He scores big gains when the market moves lower and he
escapes the loss.